Blogs in this category cite language that obscures the truth. Then they “cut the crap.”
This first one takes issue with Ben Stein’s commentary on CBS Sunday Morning. Here is the link:
Let’s look at how Ben’s language obscures the truth more than it enlightens.
Ben: “I am about to have my taxes raised dramatically.”
Let’s cut the crap: “Dramatically,” Ben? What is the actual amount? Using “dramatically,” instead of the actual amount, obscures the fact that the number may be large (in the thousands), but it is small, compared to all the thousands you make over $250,000.
Ben: “There is no known economic theory under which raising my taxes in the midst of a severe recession will help the economy recover. It isn’t part of any well known monetarist or Keynesian theory.”
Let’s cut the crap: Ben, we don’t need economic theories here. It is a simple idea, one I am sure you learned from your frugal parents–don’t spend money you don’t have. Your taxes are being raised so the government can cover more of its expenses. No fancy economic theories needed here, just the need to get out from under a crushing debt. Those of us with houses “under water” are a metaphor for the American government’s situation. We understand, so “cut the crap.”
Ben: “I tried to be successful, which is what I thought I was supposed to do. When did it turn out that was a crime to be punished?”
Let’s cut the crap: Punished for success, Ben? Again — bad choice of words, and this crap is real stinky. Evidently all those “unsuccessful” people who recently lost jobs are sneaky — getting laid off to avoid the “punishment” you are left to endure. This is not punishment. It is how an imperfect system works. We are all taxed at different levels. It is not punishment for you to be taxed at a certain rate any more than it is punishment for me to be taxed at my rate. Punishment? What crap!
Furthermore, Ben, a commentator who obscures the truth is not successful. If you are being punished (as you claim), it must be for something other than being “successful.”
Two Final Notes
Bill Maher took issue with Ben Stein’s commentary for these same reasons in his September 24 New Rules.
Readers should go to the transcript link to read other thoughtful responses to Ben. Evidently, many Americans want to “cut the crap” that came from Ben Stein’s commentary.
2 comments ↓
This is laid out really effectively and you’ll be able to see from the quality, that it has been researched and thought out quite effectively. I’ve bookmarked it and am going to forward it to others that i know will probably be extremely interested inside the info. My father is in this business, he’ll love the way you laid out the data, I’ve sent him your hyperlink. I have alos posted a permanent hyperlink on my website for other to uncover this. It’s tough for anyone to disagree with this, the information is fantastically put together.
Yes, West CO — it is difficult to disagree with this. I am always amazed, however, at how different life experiences lead people to reject others’ beliefs, no matter how well tested in real life experience. I guess it is the human nature (uneducated human nature) of many people to live as if all experiences support existing beliefs, no matter how false. Thanks for supporting my ideas.
Leave a Comment